Peace Action New York State challenges U.S. militarism in domestic and foreign policies through grassroots organizing by community and student leaders throughout the State. Together, we can work with elected leaders to create a U.S. foreign policy that promotes human needs, not endless war.

Sign the Petition: Keep Trump’s Finger Off the Nuclear Red Button


CLICK HERE to sign 


To: Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, John McCain, Bob Corker

Rescind your endorsement of Donald Trump. He is unfit to be president and cannot be allowed access to the United States’ nuclear arsenal.

The president has total authority to launch thousands of nuclear weapons at any moment. If Donald Trump gets his hands on the nuclear Red Button, no one could stop him from lighting the world on fire. We can’t let a volatile demagogue command our nuclear arsenal.

The prospect of a nuclear-armed Trump is too real. So we are calling on Republican leaders in Congress to do everything they can to keep Trump’s finger far away from the Red Button. This includes rescinding endorsements of Donald Trump for president.

Donald Trump’s rhetoric about nuclear weapons is scary. He thinks more countries should have them. He won’t rule out dropping them on Europe. And just last month, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough reported that Trump asked three times in a one-hour policy briefing, “If we’ve got [nukes], why can’t we use them?”

Leaders from both parties, including 50 GOP national security officials, warn that Trump isn’t fit to command our nuclear arsenal and would put the nation at risk. This view is shared by a huge majority of Americans: only 27% trust him with nuclear weapons.

The prospect of Trump commanding our nukes is terrifying. Further, Trump exposes just how our nuclear command system is built for first-strike and quick-launch at the president’s sole discretion. There are no checks and balances. Nothing to prevent a President Trump from launching a civilization-ending nuclear attack based on misinformation or poor judgment. No need even for a president to explain.

We know the first step to keeping our world safe from nuclear disaster is halting Trump in his tracks, before it’s too late.

It is a dereliction of public service for Republican leaders to condone a nuclear demagogue for President of the United States. The right thing to do is to disavow Trump, and do it now.

Crooks and Liars
Daily Kos
Global Zero Action
Not Who We Are
Peace Action
People For the American Way
People’s Action
Silver Linings Action
Women’s Action for New Directions


Trump asks why US can’t use nukes: MSNBC
50 G.O.P. Officials Warn Donald Trump Would Put Nation’s Security ‘at Risk’: NY Times
The Nuclear Stakes In This, And Every, Election: The Huffington Post


September 26th: Join Us and Bring Peace into the Conversation at the Presidential Debate

Gather at 4 p.m. at Uniondale  along  Hempstead Tpke. to create a peace zone and walk along at 4:30 to Monroe hall, California  for a peace zone rally with student faculty and community speakers.

4:45-5:45 PEACE ZONE RALLY outside Monroe Hall with student, faculty and community speakers

6:00- 7:30  Panel “Si Se Puede” to “Build the Wall” The Importance of the Latino Vote in 2016 Monroe Lecture Hall, Hofstra University South Campus

8:00-8:50 – BRINGING  STUDENT & COMMUNITY VOICES TO THE 2016 DEBATE : Pre-Debate Panel: Kate Alexander, PeaceAction NYS; Emilie Beck, PeaceActionMatters@Hofstra; Frederick K. Brewington, civil rights attorney; Hofstra student Bernard Coles IV; and Paul Gibson, Uniondale Community Land Trust and GUAAC. Moderator: Prof. Andrea Libresco. SPEAKOUT on issues and questions we would like to see candidates address, Monroe Lecture Hall

9-10:30 COMMUNITY DEBATE WATCH, Monroe Lecture Hall

Endorsements for Congress: Elect Peace Champions

Champions for Peace, Running for Congress:

Representative Clarke (NY-9), Representative Nadler (NY-13), Representative Paul Tonko (NY-20), Zephyr Teachout (NY-19) and Derickson Lawrence (NY-16) have been endorsed by Peace Action New York State.

Peace Action New York State is endorsing several candidates for Congress who are champions for a common sense foreign policy that prioritizes diplomacy and peace-driven solutions to today’s most entrenched conflicts. We know that bombing will not create peace, and we will elect leaders who share our vision of a world without war. Here are our 2016 endorsements for Congress:

Representative Paul Tonko (D – NY20)
Representative Tonko signed the recent bipartisan Dear Colleague letter in Congress, asking President Obama to postpone the 1.15 billion dollar sale of U.S. arms to Saudi Arabia because of their ongoing war crimes in Yemen, committed with U.S. weapons. He was one of only two New York Representatives to sign this letter – the other was Representative Nadler. Along with Peace Action, according to his voting record, Representative Tonko supports the Iran Deal, Syrian and Iraqi refugee resettlement in the United States, and Congressional debate on a new AUMF.

Representative Yvette Clarke (D- NY9)
Rep. Yvette Clarke has been the representative for New York’s 9th congressional district since 2013. From 2007 to 2012, she was the representative for New York’s 11th congressional district. She has a history of using her role in Congress to push peace-related agendas. She was among the large group of Members of Congress to send a letter to President Obama asking him to allow Congress to debate on alternatives to sending ground troops to Syria. She also joined Rep. Jim Himes to call for multilateral international negotiations to end the Syrian Civil War as an alternative to US military intervention.

She has been vocal against legislation and initiatives to restrict Syrian and Iraqi resettlement in the US, calling it a “violation of these refugees’ basic rights”. She would advocate for the refugee resettlement above 10,000 persons. Rep. Clarke supports taking practical steps towards the elimination of nuclear weapons, believing in a nuclear-free world. Because of this stance, she would not support the proposal for the $1T nuclear weapons modernization budget or the Long Range Stand Off missile. Rep. Clarke was a supporter of the Iran JCPOA. She believes that the government needs to consider alternatives to US military involvement when it comes to looking for solutions to end terrorism in the Middle East, as “The Iraq war cost the US billions of dollars and, most importantly, has not solved the issue, but worsened it.” Rep. Clarke co-sponsored the Responsible End to the War in Afghanistan Act, which “allocated funds only for purposes of providing for the safe and orderly withdrawal from Afghanistan.”

Representative Jerry Nadler (D-NY10)
Rep. Jerry Nadler has been the representative for New York’s 10th congressional district since 2013. He has previously represented New York’s 8th (1993-2013) and 17th congressional districts (1992-1993). Rep. Nadler has faced a lot of backlash from his district’s largely Jewish population for ultimately endorsing the Iran Nuclear Deal, a decision he believes was “our best chance for averting a nuclear-armed Iran”. He faced similar backlash in 2002, as New York’s only Jewish member of Congress to vote against authorizing war in Iraq.

Derickson Lawrence (I – NY16)
Derickson Lawrence is running for the 16th Congressional District of New York, challenging incumbent Representative Engel. He reached out to PANYS to better understand the Syria crisis, after seeing one of our action alerts, and consistently turns to us for policy and messaging advice on foreign policy issues. Many of his views align with PANYS. He opposes a no-fly zone in Syria and supports the current diplomatic efforts to end the Civil War in Syria, along with alternatives to US military intervention. He supports taking practical steps towards the elimination of nuclear weapons, and therefore does not support the current proposal for the $1T nuclear weapons modernization budget. He supports the Iran JCPOA and would support an international ban on autonomous weapons.

Zephyr Teachout (D-NY19)
Zephyr Teachout is running for the 19th Congressional District of New York. She has been endorsed by Bernie Sanders. She opposed the war in Iraq and disagreed with President Obama on the intervention in Libya. Her campaign page indicates that she would work as “a voice of restraint against reckless wars in the Middle East and around the world” and would advocate “for international alliances to prevent dictators from obtaining nuclear weapons, and working in coalition to prevent the root causes of radicalization and terror that have given rise to ISIS and al-Qaeda”. She also opposes the TPP.


Hofstra Debate: Bring Peace to the Election

CREATING A PEACE ZONEGather at 4 p.m. at Uniondale  along  Hempstead Tpke. to create a peace zone and walk along at 4:30 to Monroe hall, California  for a peace zone rally with student faculty and community speakers.


4:45-5:45 PEACE ZONE RALLY outside Monroe Hall with student, faculty and community speakers


6:00- 7:30  Panel “Si Se Puede” to “Build the Wall” The Importance of the Latino Vote in 2016 Monroe Lecture Hall, Hofstra University South Campus


8:00-8:50 – BRINGING  STUDENT & COMMUNITY VOICES TO THE 2016 DEBATE : Pre-Debate Panel: Kate Alexander, PeaceAction NYS; Emilie Beck, PeaceActionMatters@Hofstra; Frederick K. Brewington, civil rights attorney; Hofstra student Bernard Coles IV; and Paul Gibson, Uniondale Community Land Trust and GUAAC. Moderator: Prof. Andrea Libresco. SPEAKOUTon issues and questions we would like to see candidates address, Monroe Lecture Hall


9-10:30 COMMUNITY DEBATE WATCH, Monroe Lecture Hall

US Leading Peace Activists in Syria: News Release

News Release: US to Syria Peace and Fact-Finding Delegation

2016 August 9~ A Peace and Fact-Finding Delegation, organized by the U.S. Peace Council (USPC) just returned from a week-long visit to Syria. The delegation met with representatives of numerous NGOs, heads of industry, religious leaders and civil society, high-level leaders of the Syrian government, and it held an extended private meeting with President Bashar al Assad.

The delegation’s findings could not be more timely as the world watched the Obama administration escalating violence and bombing in Libya and threatening to escalate its overt military role in Syria. These violent actions take place while the Syrian government and its allies are closing in on the various foreign-funded terrorist groups that have plagued the people of Syria for over 5 years.

Consisting of seven activists representing various peace organizations the Peace Delegation was led jointly by Henry Lowendorf from the executive committee of the USPC and Gerry Condon, Vice President of Veterans for Peace.

Almost everything we read about Syria in the media is wrong,” said Gerry Condon. “The reality is that the U.S. government is supporting armed extremist groups who are terrorizing the Syrian people and trying to destroy Syria’s secular state.

In order to hide that ugly reality and push violent regime change,” continued Condon, “the U.S. is conducting a psychological warfare campaign to demonize Syria’s president, Bashar al Assad. This is a classic tactic that veterans have seen over and over. It is shocking, however, to realize how willingly the media repeat this propaganda, and how many people believe it to be true.

Donna Nassor pointed out,

Contrary to media reports, in eastern Aleppo, as in Medaya earlier, we learned that it is the terrorists who prevent supplies from getting in and civilians from leaving even while the Syrian government creates channels for residents to leave that besieged part of Aleppo.

Furthermore, people in the US are unaware of the strangulating sanctions their government is imposing on the Syrian people,” stated delegate Madelyn Hoffman.

Similar to US sanctions on Iraq in the 1990s that killed over half a million children, this illegal economic war is causing loss of life and unnecessary suffering of the Syrian people. Universally, everyone the delegation talked with asked that these sanctions be lifted.

The Peace delegation spent nearly two hours in dialogue with President Assad, a soft spoken man with a wry sense of humor who thoughtfully answered questions about the current engagement in Aleppo, his perceptions of the bilateral negotiations between the US and Russia, and the revolutionary policy of ending the war through grass roots reconciliation initiatives.  Judith Bello reflected, “Syria’s reconciliation plan is a powerful example of a restorative response to divisive forces spreading violence and chaos in a generally tolerant and peaceful country. .”

All members of the Delegation returned convinced that Syria’s sovereignty must be respected, that it up to Syrians to overcome whatever problems exist in their country without interference from the US,” said Henry Lowendorf, co-leader of the delegation. “There exists in Syria a strong nonviolent political opposition who are working both inside and outside the government.”

As delegate Vanessa Beeley stated,

“Syria is being invaded by US-allied proxy forces that are torturing, abusing, kidnapping and massacring the Syrian people. We urge that the world start listening to the Syrian people who demand their right to determine their own future and decide who should govern them.”

Joe Jamison concluded,

We call on the US, its allies in Europe, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan and Israel to stop supporting the mercenaries no matter what they name themselves, end the war on Syria, end the sanctions and restore normal relations with the Syrian people and their government – immediately. If the US and its allies continue promoting the terrorists, as many inside Syria told us, the fire they lit in Syria in 2011 will continue to engulf more of the world.

Members of the Peace Delegation:

—  Henry Lowendorf (Co-Leader of the Delegation), Member of the Executive Board, US Peace Council

—  Gerry Condon (Co-Leader of the Delegation), National Vice President, Veterans For Peace

—  Joe Jamison, Member of the Executive Board, US Peace Council

—  Madelyn Hoffman, Executive Director (not representing the organization), New Jersey Peace Action

—  Judith Bello, Member of Administrative Committee, United National Antiwar Coalition (UNAC)

—  Vanessa Beeley, Independent Journalist, Member of Steering Committee, Syria Solidarity Movement

—  Donna Nassor, Attorney, College Professor, Palestinian Rights Activist

Commemorating the Nuclear Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

This speech was originally given by PAFNYS Co-Director Kate Alexander at “Know Where You Stand and Stand There”, an event organized by the Long Island Alliance for Peaceful Alternatives, and Great Neck SANE/Peace Action, for the commemoration of the 71st anniversary of the U.S. nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

I want to acknowledge the difficulty of the world & political climate we find ourselves in today. Because it is so heavy. Because it is so difficult. Because, as is so true in the issue of abolishing nuclear weapons, this is not a political battle fought with moralistic language – it is a battle for our morals, happening in the political field.

And, just as so many holes were being made in the barriers that have kept privileges invisible and the suffering of the marginalized away from our consciousness – we have politicians brazenly working to reinforce those barriers, and millions of American choosing ignorance & hate and the security of an unchallenged world view, over informed empathy & compassion and love.

Tonight, we will make a few more holes in the barriers that have kept us separated from each other, the barriers which have shielded us from the consequences of our actions, and especially, the consequences of our militarism.

Because, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are easily among the most devastating consequences of our militarism in U.S. history.

And yet, somehow, having nuclear weapons in the U.S. is conscionable. And proposals to modernize our nuclear weapons are heralded as essential. .

And I think that is because, we do not sit with the discomfort of war.
We do not sit with the moral discomfort of nuclear war & its damage.
We throw around words like catastrophic, cataclysmic.

But that’s not how you describe what this really is. That’s not the language the communities affected by nuclear war use.

They use the language of loss & heartbreak.

Kunihiko Bonkohara : “My father was blown away by the blast and his body was pierced by shards of glass and wooden rubble… My father went to a nearby river to wash his body, and when he came back home the black rain began to fall… Years later,  My father was diagnosed with stomach cancer and my mother with breast cancer, and they both passed away. Because I was in Brazil, I was not able to meet with them at the end.” –

Shoso Hirai: “Mr. Hirai was exposed to the atomic bomb at his friend’s house, 4 kilometers from the epicenter, while going to a munitions factory as a mobilized student. He entered into the city center the following day to look for his father who had gone to work and his younger brother who was also a mobilized student. He only found his father’s bones and his younger brother is still missing”

We must sit with these stories. We have to. It is our moral duty.
 Because we have to recognize war for what it is & eliminate the language of grand conquest.
 We have to use a different language.

We have to use this language of loss & grief.
 Because that is the way it is expressed by communities who have actually had to survive what war has done to them, what our nation has done to them, what we in silence – more afraid of protests and protestors than of maintaining weapons of war and endless war – what we have done to them.

We have to break down the barriers that keep us secure in our place in the world & welcome with open arms the informed perspectives of others, that challenge us, and demand better of us.

In this same way, allies for racial justice, allies for black lives matter, must listen and take leadership from the communities directly affected. They must listen to the needs of the families of Michael Brown, Tamir Rice, Alton Sterling, Philando Castille, and Eric Garner. Sandra Bland. Korryn Gaines. As allies, we must listen to the cries and protests and anger and expertise from the community impacted by our domestic wars if we are ever going to end them.

And, we must listen to the cries and grief and anger of communities impacted by our foreign wars – by our nuclear weapons –  if we are ever going to end them.

But first, before we can stand with these communities and for their demands, we have to listen to them:

Shigeko Sasamori: “Shigeko Sasamori san was 13 years old when the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. Hearing the sound of a plane, she looked up to see a B-29 flying overhead — seconds later she was knocked unconscious by the blast. When she came to, she was so badly burned that she was unrecognizable. Shigeko repeated her name and address over and over until she was finally found by her father.”

Heartbreak & grief.

If we recognize this as loss – loss that is caused by us – I think we would recognize and expect of ourselves better.

We would begin to exercise moral leadership for nuclear abolition.
Just because it is the right thing to do.

For the same reason little kids say “this isn’t fair”
Nuclear abolition is just, simply, unequivocally, and essentially just the right thing to do.

And it is simple, despite what the pundits tell you. Pundits who by the way, are not the experts in nuclear war, only in military strategy. They are not experts in long-term peace, they are experts in war. But, the only experts in nuclear war are those who lived through it: the Hibakusha.

So it is simple, because we have our experts, and the Hibakusha tell us simply: we must build a world without nuclear weapons. The suffering is to great to risk being repeated.

One nuclear weapon, detonating over a city, would instantly burn away 40-65 square miles. That is roughly the size of San Francisco and 2-3 times the size of Manhattan.

120-200,000 people immediately died in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and hundreds of thousands more died in the following months and years from radiation poisoning.

And, the typical U.S. nuclear weapon is 70 times more powerful that the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima.

The U.S. still has over 6,970 nuclear weapons even though one of our current nuclear weapons is 70 times more powerful that the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima.

Knowing what we did to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and what we did to the Japanese at home. All I can think is: what were we thinking? and how close are we to doing this again, but in the Middle East and to our Muslim friends?
 If some objective, some mission or goal, requires that kind of destruction
maybe we should re-evaluate that goal?
Nuclear weapons do not root out terrorism.

Nuclear weapons do not discriminate between military and civilians.
Nuclear weapons have not prevented conflict between India and Pakistan.
Nuclear weapons have not prevented North Korea weapons tests.
Nuclear weapons have not prevented the U.S. from provoking Russia, or vice versa.

Nuclear weapons only destroy.
The destroy our environment.
The destroy our economy.
They destroy public health.
They destroy families.

And as the people creating them
The destroy our hearts & minds.
They destroy our standing in the world.

And they serve none of today’s threats in international peace & security.
 They are one of the greatest threats in international peace and security today.

And keeping them, maintaining them, wastes our resources.

And yet, the current administration is proposing spending $1 trillion over 30 years to modernize our nuclear weapons arsenal.

$1 trillion. or 348 billion in over ten years.
on a weapons system we are never supposed to use.

For that same amount of money, for 10 years, we could:
Provide 39.2M homes with renewable energy
Give 10.48M students four-year scholarships to a public university
Support 3.37M veterans receiving VA medical care
Give 9.93M low-income persons health care
Get 4.12 M children enrolled in the head start program
Pay the salaries of 464 thousands elementary school teachers

Education, health care, veterans medical care, renewable energy, or even criminal justice reform….or nuclear weapons.

It’s pretty clear where we should be spending our money.
On programs we need, not on weapons we should never use.

But, instead of thinking about what we could spend with that money, think for a minute about what we will lose because we have to find the money for this modernization program.

Education, health care, veterans medical care, renewable energy.
These are the programs that lose funding because we fund endless war, endlessly.

For students here, for those of you with children, and for the students whose peace activism we encourage at peace action – and for me – the question is simple:

“how can we afford these weapons without bankrupting my future?”

But there’s more at stake here than money:
even though these are the investments that will shape our future.

What we’re also trading in for nuclear weapons, is our morality.

Because how can we listen to Shigeko’s story, and remind ourselves that she was so badly burned she could not move, and then tell her: we are building more nuclear weapons.

How can we listen to Shoso Hirai, whose brother is still missing, and tell him: we need these weapons because we might have to use them again.

How can we listen to Kunihiko Bonkohara, who lost both his parents, and tell him: these weapons will protect us.

President Obama made history this year when he became the first sitting U.S. President to visit Hiroshima.

There he said:

“Why do we come to this place, to Hiroshima?  We come to ponder a terrible force unleashed in a not so distant past.  We come to mourn the dead, including over 100,000 in Japanese men, women and children; thousands of Koreans; a dozen Americans held prisoner.  Their souls speak to us. They ask us to look inward, to take stock of who we are and what we might become. “

I couldn’t agree more, Mr. President.
So when our pundits – and our adminstration-  tell us that nuclear weapons are necessary for security, we must shout back:

You may be experts in military strategy, but you are NOT experts in nuclear war.
The HIBAKUSHA are experts in nuclear war.
The HIBAKUSHA know the costs of nuclear weapons.
Our CHILDREN will know the costs of nuclear weapons, when you defund their future.

And I have LISTENED to them.
And I have GRIEVED for them.
And I have LEARNED from them.
And today, we STAND with them,

in saying:

We MUST rid the world of nuclear weapons.

Hiroshima/Nagasaki Resources

On August 6th, 1945, the U.S. dropped the first nuclear bomb used in war – and on August 9th, we dropped the second. The two bombings killed at least 120,000 people instantly, and hundreds of thousands more died in the months and years following, from toxic radiation poisoning.

Every year, peace communities across the United States come together to remember this lesson of history, and to advocate for the abolition of nuclear weapons, so this dark chapter in American and World history, will never be repeated.

Below is a collection of resources as you mobilize communities across New York State to remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki – and to ask why on earth we still have nuclear weapons on this earth.

Interested in attending an event near you? Find our chapter events across the State on our calendar,
CLICK HERE to find an event near you.

Click HERE to download a copy of the poster of our commemorative events state-wide.

Posters + Palmcards: 8.5x11 + 5x7

You can view our poster and palmcard on the right. You can download them by clicking the links below:

Click HERE to download posters sharing Hibakusha stories.
Click HERE to download palmcards sharing Hibakusha stories.

Click HERE to download posters sharing President Obama’s positions on nuclear weapons.
Click HERE to download palmcards sharing President Obama’s positions on nuclear weapons.

Click HERE to download posters sharing stories of the U.S. narrowly avoiding nuclear disasters.
Click HERE to download palmcards sharing stories of the U.S. narrowly avoiding nuclear disasters (print double-sided).

Click HERE to download posters sharing facts on nuclear weapons.
Click HERE to download palmcards sharing facts on nuclear weapons.

Download a physical copy of our petition to President Obama, calling on him to keep his promises & work towards a world without nuclear weapons. Click HERE to download this petition, which you can circulate in your Peace Action chapter, community or school.

Postcards: 5x7

You can view our postcards on the right. You can download them by clicking the links below:

Click HERE to download postcards to the Japanese Consul General, apologizing for the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Click HERE to download postcards to President Obama, calling on him to work towards a world without nuclear weapons.

Make Your Own Resources: Quotes

“Just as we stood for freedom in the 20th century, we must stand together for the right of people everywhere to live free from fear in the 21st century. And as the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act. We cannot succeed in this endeavor alone, but we can lead it, we can start it.  So today, I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons. “

~ President Barack Obama, April 5, 2009, Prague

“We simply cannot allow the 21st century to be darkened by the worst weapons of the 20th century.”

~ President Barack Obama, Nov 29, 2012, National Defense University, Washington, DC

 “A nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought. And no matter how great the obstacles may seem, we must never stop our efforts to reduce the weapons of war.  We must never stop at all until we see the day when nuclear arms have been banished from the face of the Earth.”

~ President Ronald Reagan, 1984 State of the Union Address

“Today, every inhabitant of this planet must contemplate the day when this planet may no longer be habitable. Every man, woman and child lives under a nuclear sword of Damocles, hanging by the slenderest of threads, capable of being cut at any moment by accident or miscalculation or by madness. The weapons of war must be abolished before they abolish us.”

~  President John F. Kennedy,   Address Before the General Assembly of the United Nations, New York City, September 25, 1961

“I think the fate not only of our own civilization, but I think the fate of world and the future of the human race, is involved in preventing a nuclear war.”

~  (Senator ) John F. Kennedy, Third Nixon-Kennedy Presidential Debate, October 13, 1960

“Nine nations still cling firmly to these ghastly instruments of terror, believing, paradoxically, that by threatening to obliterate others they are maintaining the peace. Quite unaccountably, all are squandering precious resources, human and material, on programs to modernize and upgrade their arsenals — an egregious theft from the world’s poor.”

 ~  Desmond Tutu,  CNN editorial, Feb 13, 2014

“The sheer folly of trying to defend a nation by destroying all life on the planet must be apparent to anyone capable of rational thought.”          

~ Her Majesty Queen Noor of Jordan

Our collective efforts to move away from the nuclear abyss have remained too modest in ambition and brought only limited success. Nuclear weapons should be stigmatized, banned and eliminated before they abolish us.”         

President Heinz Fischer of Austria, Sept. 26, 2013 at the UN

“Obama should visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki, see the reality of the atomic bombings for himself, and take a determined step toward nuclear weapons abolition from the atomic bombed sites to the world.”

~ Hiroshima Mayor Kazumi Matsui, April 29,  2014 at the UN..

“We are in a race between cooperation and catastrophe. We must run faster.”

— Former Senator and Nuclear Threat Initiative co-founder Sam Nunn     ~ Nov 11, 2013,   address to the American Nuclear Society